Hayley Williams

monobear

Member
Some screen grabs
 

Attachments

  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h13m10s955.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h13m10s955.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 4,827
  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h13m42s146.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h13m42s146.jpg
    142.3 KB · Views: 4,500
  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m02s128.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m02s128.jpg
    62.7 KB · Views: 4,350
  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m20s912.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m20s912.jpg
    83.2 KB · Views: 4,436
  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m34s518.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m34s518.jpg
    84.3 KB · Views: 4,511
  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m43s992.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m43s992.jpg
    85.3 KB · Views: 4,402
  • vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m55s088.jpg
    vlcsnap-2025-01-15-18h14m55s088.jpg
    103.3 KB · Views: 5,074

uwcwatcher

Well-Known Member
What am I missing here?
I saved the image and did a reverse image search one 'Google' - these photos are hosted on other publicly available sites...with dates going back as much as four years?
They may well be 'leaks' and certainly original to THIS forum, but they're definitely not new!!!
The topless one?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6968.jpeg
    IMG_6968.jpeg
    134.8 KB · Views: 6,776

JamesHarlett

Active Member
It was confirmed as fully ai on another forum they went into proper details with it and showed all the evidence

The original images are clearly not AI. It's just been upscaled way beyond the amount that an AI upscaler can handle. When it has little information it has to guess. The original image so so small that the AI doesn't even know it's a hand to begin with.

"some bloke said it on a forum" doesn't count as a valid source of confirmation.
 
Top